This testimony constitutes critical supporting evidence in this formal complaint and should be duly examined by the relevant authorities.

»The events described in this testimony are not isolated incidents but rather part of a broader pattern of institutional abuse, repression, and state negligence. The psychological and physical torment inflicted upon me is not merely an individual injustice but a representation of a systemic failure of the European Union’s fundamental rights framework.

»This case exemplifies a direct violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which explicitly prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment. Moreover, it constitutes a breach of Articles 1 and 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, reaffirming that human dignity and the prohibition of slavery and forced labor are not mere principles but binding legal obligations for all Member States.

»If no immediate action is taken by the European institutions, this will establish a legal and moral precedent that allows Member States to continue these violations with impunity. Such inaction would not only be a betrayal of European values but a dangerous message to future generations, signaling that fundamental rights are conditional, not absolute. This cannot be allowed.

»If the European institutions fail to act upon this evidence, history will remember this silence not as neutrality, but as complicity. The credibility of the European Union as a defender of human rights now stands on trial.

»The credibility of the European Union as a defender of human rights is not only questioned—it now stands on trial before history. Failure to take decisive action will irreversibly damage the EU’s legitimacy in upholding the fundamental rights it claims to protect.