**RFC Maia-001-BETA: Project Overview Degoteig Institucional Maia ("Maya's Institutional Drip Protocol")**
Project Name: Degoteig Institucional Maia
Version: 1.0-BETA (Unofficial Edition)
Project Lead: Joan Balaguer Ardanuy
Project Assistant: Tars Balaguer Ardanuy
Initiation Date: June 2025
=======
### 1. General Objective
The **Degoteig Institucional Maia** (Maya's Institutional Drip Protocol) is a strategic and recursive complaint mechanism designed to systematically expose clinical irregularities, institutional opacity, and the procedural void surrounding psychiatric care in Catalonia’s public health infrastructure, particularly within the Girona Health Region and the IAS (Institut d'Assistència Satànica).
»This protocol is not a random bureaucratic tantrum. It is a **methodical, evidence-based confrontation*»rooted in administrative persistence and epistemic accountability. Its goals include, but are not limited to:
»1. Making structural dysfunctions visible.
»2. Questioning diagnosis validity.
»3. Reclaiming the patient’s right to a coherent narrative.
»4. Exposing the iatrogenic perils of uncritical medication practices.
### 2. Methodology
The protocol is implemented via sequential *commits»(yes, commits), each representing an autonomous and traceable administrative action:
»1. Every commit includes legal, clinical, and documentary material.
»2. Each action is surgically targeted at specific actors or levels of the administrative/clinical hierarchy.
»3. Commits are independent but thematically entangled, generating momentum and cognitive friction inside bureaucratic systems.
All commits are timestamped, monitored, and escalated when ignored. If unanswered, they recursively trigger new commits.
**Footnote 404:** This is not a bug, but a loop. A measured, poetic, administrative loop.
### 3. Intervention Criteria
Degoteig Institucional Maia is governed by the following sacred laws:
»1. **Radical evidentialism**: Every claim is supported by documents, transcripts, or public record.
»2. **Discursive ferocity without insult**: The tone is surgical. There is no vulgarity, only institutional vivisection.
»3. **Intellectual detachment**: The protagonist is a patient, but the narrative is structurally diagnostic.
»4. **No capitulation**: Silence is met with elaborated escalation. Always.
»5. **Meta-systemic intention**: Each claim is both singular and symptomatic.
### 4. Expected Outcomes
»1. Collapse of the myth of "second opinion" in Catalan mental health.
»2. Exposure of administrative bottlenecks that obstruct legitimate requests.
»3. Documented evidence for future litigation, legislative reform, or poetic retaliation.
»4. Institutional discomfort.
»5. Philosophical clarity.
### 5. Communication & Dissemination
Initially restricted to administrative channels, but designed for lateral expansion:
»1. Future open-access dossiers.
»2. Media involvement (if desired).
»3. Possible cross-patient collaborative escalation.
**This RFC is not an actual request for comments. It is a comment that requested itself.**